It was about three years ago that we elected 227 corporators to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). Of the 227 seats, 74 were reserved for candidates from backward or scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. The candidates had to provide a caste certificate as proof of their caste. The caste certificate is obtained typically from the collector's office, which comes under the revenue department and not under the social welfare department. The caste certificates are scrutinized by the Scrutiny Department for their validity after the BMC elections are over. This process takes several months. Of the 74 winning reserved candidates, the caste verification committee found 17 to be false. That is, almost one-fourth of all winners had a false certificate. If this statistic is extrapolated to the whole state (which has a population of about four crore potential caste certificate seekers), then we may have more than one crore fake certificates. This sounds similar to the case of Andhra Pradesh, which found out that based on the number of ration cards issued, 85 per cent of the state was below the poverty line.
The 17 affected candidates, fearing that their elections may be set aside, or claiming that their certificates were not really fake, moved court to prevent the election authorities from declaring their certificates as fake. This process took several months, or years, finally until which time the term of the BMC corporator may end. So a court decision after that is pointless.
In July, 2010, the disqualification of Shiv Sena corporator Pravin Devhare in ward no.185 by the Bombay High Court came as a blow to the saffron party in the Hindu-dominated area. The court instead appointed MNS candidate Prakash Patankar as the corporator. Devhare, one of the 17 corporators who were accused of submitting fake caste certificates during the civic elections of 2007, had challenged the case in the Bombay High Court. He had sought a stay on the findings of the scrutiny committee that found the certificates fake. However, the High Court disqualified Devhare’s nomination and appointed Patankar who had secured the second highest number of votes — 909 votes short of Devhare’s 9,800. As the matter was going on in court, that particular ward did not have a corporator for the past three years. .Similarly, the fate of Mahadeshwar Pandurang, Shiv Sena (accused of submitting fake caste certificates) and Suresh Thakur, Congress has been in the courts for more than three years. Mahadeshwar Pandurang who was declared winner was challenged by Suresh Thakur in the Courts. After fighting a long-drawn legal battle in courts challenging Mahadeshwar Pandurang’s fake caste identity the matter has finally reached the tip of the ice-berg. Suresh Thakur while speaking to Santacruz Patrika clarified and said, “Caste certificates of Vaishyawani and Kulwant Wani under OBC has been dismissed by the High Court and orders passed to remove from OBC.” He further added, “Mahadeshwar Pandurang had appealed for a stay but the HC pronounced an order dismissing the caste certificate of Mahadeshwar.” “Though after a long wait I am delighted but let’s wait for the final outcome which in most probability will be pronounced shortly,” concluded the delighted Suresh Thakur. However, while speaking to Santacruz Patrika, Mahadeshwar Pandurang clarified and said, “The HC came to a conclusion that the GR of 1995, 96 and circular of 2008 issued by the government was not proper and correct and accordingly the case was squashed.” I have done no wrong and submitted my caste certificates of Vaishyawani as per order. But if the court does not treat it as correct I have no say and have to respect the HC order. My elder brother and my son have got validity as Vaishyawani by the government and why I have been discriminated. The Court order is final and I have respect for the order,” added Mahadeshwar.Further, when questioned on the next course of action he replied, “The alternative is to move the Supreme Court. But since I have no money and my ill health doesn’t permit, I leave it to the decision of the Court. The final decision in theSmall Cause Court
The 17 affected candidates, fearing that their elections may be set aside, or claiming that their certificates were not really fake, moved court to prevent the election authorities from declaring their certificates as fake. This process took several months, or years, finally until which time the term of the BMC corporator may end. So a court decision after that is pointless.
In July, 2010, the disqualification of Shiv Sena corporator Pravin Devhare in ward no.185 by the Bombay High Court came as a blow to the saffron party in the Hindu-dominated area. The court instead appointed MNS candidate Prakash Patankar as the corporator. Devhare, one of the 17 corporators who were accused of submitting fake caste certificates during the civic elections of 2007, had challenged the case in the Bombay High Court. He had sought a stay on the findings of the scrutiny committee that found the certificates fake. However, the High Court disqualified Devhare’s nomination and appointed Patankar who had secured the second highest number of votes — 909 votes short of Devhare’s 9,800. As the matter was going on in court, that particular ward did not have a corporator for the past three years. .Similarly, the fate of Mahadeshwar Pandurang, Shiv Sena (accused of submitting fake caste certificates) and Suresh Thakur, Congress has been in the courts for more than three years. Mahadeshwar Pandurang who was declared winner was challenged by Suresh Thakur in the Courts. After fighting a long-drawn legal battle in courts challenging Mahadeshwar Pandurang’s fake caste identity the matter has finally reached the tip of the ice-berg. Suresh Thakur while speaking to Santacruz Patrika clarified and said, “Caste certificates of Vaishyawani and Kulwant Wani under OBC has been dismissed by the High Court and orders passed to remove from OBC.” He further added, “Mahadeshwar Pandurang had appealed for a stay but the HC pronounced an order dismissing the caste certificate of Mahadeshwar.” “Though after a long wait I am delighted but let’s wait for the final outcome which in most probability will be pronounced shortly,” concluded the delighted Suresh Thakur. However, while speaking to Santacruz Patrika, Mahadeshwar Pandurang clarified and said, “The HC came to a conclusion that the GR of 1995, 96 and circular of 2008 issued by the government was not proper and correct and accordingly the case was squashed.” I have done no wrong and submitted my caste certificates of Vaishyawani as per order. But if the court does not treat it as correct I have no say and have to respect the HC order. My elder brother and my son have got validity as Vaishyawani by the government and why I have been discriminated. The Court order is final and I have respect for the order,” added Mahadeshwar.Further, when questioned on the next course of action he replied, “The alternative is to move the Supreme Court. But since I have no money and my ill health doesn’t permit, I leave it to the decision of the Court. The final decision in the
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment